Ridgefield Deer
Committee
Ridgefield Recreation Center
195 Danbury Road
Ridgefield, CT 06877
A meeting of the Ridgefield Deer
Committee was held in the Copper Beech Room of the Ridgefield Recreation
Center, 195 Danbury Road, Ridgefield, CT
06877 on March 28, 2005 at approximately 7:10 p.m.
The following members were present:
Douglas
Barile
Tom
Belote
Guy
Bocchino
Matthew
Denesuk
Pat
Hutchings
Peter
Keeler
Lee
Pepin
Raymond
Sementini
Pat
Sesto
Gwen
Thaxter
Tom
Venus
Ms. Sesto chaired the meeting. Nancy McDaniel was present to take minutes.
MINUTES
Ms.
Sesto asked for comment on the minutes of February 8, 2005. There being none, it was
RESOLVED by consensus, that the minutes
of the meeting of February 8, 2005 be and hereby are approved and ordered filed
in the minute book of the Committee and the Town Hall minute book.
NEW BUSINESS
Ms.
Sesto stated that the point of the meeting was to agree on next steps for the
Committee. Copies of Mr. Barile’s
outline on how to proceed and Mr. Venus’ talking points were distributed.
Ms.
Sesto asked members to speak to the following question: do we believe as a whole that there is a
deer overpopulation problem? Each
member was given the floor to respond.
Mr.
Barile: Ridgefield’s data is consistent
with that of neighboring towns, perhaps 50-80 deer per square mile. Although we do not have exact counts of the
deer population, the range is above what is sustainable. Because deer contribute to the Lyme Disease
cycle and to damage to the understory, Mr. Barile advocated action to bring the
population to 20 deer per square mile or fewer.
Ms.
Hutchings: She noted that she sees half
the deer in her backyard that she counted the previous year. She agreed that Lyme Disease and understory
depletion are problems, but did not think that Ridgefield has a deer problem
and did not think that more studies are needed.
Ms.
Thaxter: She would like a balanced
ecosystem, but realize that is not possible because we do not have data on
Ridgefield. We need scientific data
before acting.
Mr.
Denesuk: He quoted Kirby Stafford’s
statement that 10-15 deer are the threshold for preventing transmission of
disease to people. We can always attack
studies and should not demand precision.
The important thing is to accept that the town has more deer than it
should have and then act.
Mr.
Bocchino: From the beginning, he wanted
quantifiable data and now feels that enough has been accumulated. He is convinced that the town does have a
problem.
Mr.
Pepin: The town does have a deer
problem. The understory has been
consumed. An effort could be made to
count the deer, but absolute accuracy is not possible.
Mr.
Keeler: There is a deer problem, but it
is not as serious as it once was. He is
undecided on what steps to take to solve the problem.
Mr.
Sementini: He is convinced that there
is a problem with over population in Ridgefield.
Mr.
Venus: There is overpopulation. Lyme Disease and collisions can be managed
without deer density management, but damage to the understory is a major
concern. Deer will continue to
increase. There are not effective
predators, so something must be done in the short to medium term.
Mr.
Belote: He agreed that there is a
problem. His primary concern is the
environmental impact. He supported
hunting and the search for non-lethal methodologies to be employed after
initial culling. He favored moving
ahead to prepare the report. No matter
what the deer count is, damage to the environment is evident. Although he would like a county-wide survey,
he acknowledged that Ridgefield does not have the funds to commission it.
Ms.
Sesto: Deer density is higher than what
is ecologically balanced as evidenced by understory damage, automobile
accidents and Lyme Disease. She was
persuaded by data from the CT Agricultural Station, the DEP and studies from
other well respected conservation organizations that Ridgefield does have a
deer problem.
Ms.
Thaxter spoke again about her conviction that the town needs scientific data
before making a recommendation. She
stated that no action should be taken until Ridgefield has a GIS map and data
that is Ridgefield-specific. She would
like to see Ridgefield used as a test case that could be instructive to other
towns. She suggested bringing the DEP and
Yale to the table to define the problem, obtain scientific data and then come
up with a solution.
Ms.
Hutchings did not agree that a problem exists.
The remaining members thought that there is a problem and that
sufficient data has been assembled for action.
CONSENSUS
After
further discussion, consensus was reached that the incidence of Lyme Disease,
vehicular accidents and understory damage is too high to be acceptable.
The
Committee Report
– Ms Sesto suggested writing summaries of the speakers’ presentations. Mr. Denesuk thought that the summaries
should be added to the appendix. Mr.
Belote called for volunteers to contribute reports on the three problem
areas. The working groups will be:
Ecosystem – Messrs. Bocchino, Sanders,
Venus
Accidents – Messrs. Keeler, Roche,
Sementini
Lyme Disease – Mr. Barile, Ms. Daley
NEXT MEETING
The
next meeting will be on April 12, 2005 in the Copper Beach Room of the
Recreation Center.
Ms. Sesto concluded the business of
the meeting in order to allow
members of the public to speak.
PUBLIC COMMENT
Joe Tucker, representing White Tail
Solutions – Mr. Tucker commended
the Committee on its efforts. As a representative of bow hunters, he
spoke of dedication to the sport with
no financial rewards. He
recommended involving the residents in
completing a survey that
could
define deer hot spots, and he passed out a sample survey. He would like to have more properties, such
as open space, available for hunting.
Meat harvested would be donated.
His group stands ready to help the town to reduce the deer population.
Lynn
Gorfinkle – She stated that the number of accidents and the incidence of Lyme
Disease are statistically insignificant.
Vehicle collisions in Greenwich have decreased recently. Although hunting would remove perhaps 150
deer a year, it would not solve the problem.
She warned of relying on studies from other towns because they may have
used faulty data. The problem is not
clear cut.
ADJOURNMENT
Ms.
Sesto adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy McDaniel